Click image to go to Amazon.com to order. |
To say anything about a poet one reads in translation is
sketchy. But there are things one can
say and things worth saying. The overall
arc of his style still carries through, I’m sure, and what marks it out is how
it builds on voids and absences. The
significance of his topics emerges from the accumulation of what remains unsaid
about them, or rather what he says around them.
It may be a consequence of his persistent concern for the limitations of
language. Like other poets who take up language
and it limitations as a subject, a poet like George Oppen, Lihn is somewhat
experimental in his approach, though not so syntactically complex as
Oppen. For Lihn “style sure isn’t the
man/but a summary of all his uncertainties.”
Uncertainties accumulate in Lihn’s sparsely punctuated poems in an
attempt, it seems, to create a context for those uncertainties, a kind of
linguistic net.
When he traveled the United States and Canada, his
observations always picked out the odd and alienated, the homeless who were rendered
otherworldly by the extremity of their destitute living. The genderless “Brooklyn Monster,” the woman
in Toronto who stared at the dying youth with her eyes of snow. Lihn sees these homeless people not as mere figures
of economic failure but as something of the repressed specters of our society’s
apparent success. As he says elsewhere, “we’re
overrun by inhuman times.”
In another place he says, “all our ways of meaning things
are contaminated.” Thus the darker sides
of our society are closest to purity, or at least, to accuracy in depicting the
soul of our society. In the poem “The
Age of Data,” he puts his finger on the spiritual failure of mid-to-late 20th
century thinking: the failure of pure analysis, our god of information, for
Instead of joining, we separate
Separation and information are confoundedand data is just the opposite of God.
It’s no wonder that his poems have the force of a Prokofiev
sonata and the power of a Turner painting.
Their ability to suggest or conjure an impression are what stir the
deepest response and engage the harshest emotions, much as the way Robert
Lowell’s best poems do with their images and tone. This is a rather strange thing considering
that Lihn first attempted to be a painter in college, but after turning to
writing he produced, instead of a poetry of dense meticulous imagery, a poetry
of limpid images that disclose a depth of subtler thematic implications. So his poem on Turner concludes with something
that might describe his poetics,
the moment that consumes the substance
and leaves only the embers of Beingthat conflagration that comes from clouds and wind
and burns—spread out on the waters—its image.
In the last weeks of Lihn’s life, he composed poems
confronting the impossible enigma of death in the most personal terms. These are possibly the least interesting poems
of the collection as they court those truisms more often than elsewhere. But they have their moments. Certainly, facing the end, he is looking
farther into those dark places, those voids to discover the defining spaces around
them. For him, his poetry had become
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .death,
the dream of writing where all discomfort has its place
the prison of your being that deprived you of the other name
of love
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . written silently upon the
wall.
In his final weeks—dying just months shy of his 60th
birthday in 1988—Lihn writing, revising, even correcting proofs of his final collection
the night before his death, he was connecting the limitations of the self with
the limitations of language and life. These
final poems seem less elaborate, sometimes pointed and powerful, at others not
fully engaged. Yet they mark the closer
of a life devoted to poetry. If art
imitates life and we are “works of art momentarily alive,” there is in connecting
the limitations of life and language an insight into the nature of the self,
the constructed ego and how its grammar breaks down at the edges or in the face
of what is hard or impossible to define.
Perhaps lying in bed he realized
Facing death he resists the giving in
even though touched by it he’s a shadowbut a shadow of something, clinging
to the imitation of life.
His life had become a work of art, a painted representation
of the patterns he had followed, sketched into his poems and other writings. Of course, this calls to mind Wallace Stevens
who traced a similar trajectory in the imagination. Certainly, Lihn stakes as much in the
imagination as Stevens, though with less insistence. Lihn also had the grit of the quotidian in
his poetry, the hard, troubled reality that life in a politically volatile
place as Chile would produce in others of his generation. His voice never stops insisting on the
negative spaces that define the apparent truth; much like a Taoist insists
there is no mountain without a valley.
I am glad I ran into this sensitive and lucid appraisal of Enrique Lihn's writing. I'm Adriana Valdés, I edited his posthumous book with Pedro Lastra.
ReplyDeleteAdriana,
DeleteThank you so much for your valued comment. I'm glad you find the essay's insights "sensitive and lucid." I couldn't ask for more than that in writing about such an amazing poet.